Archive for globalism

Transhumanism-The New Eugenics?

Posted in eugenics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 9, 2008 by Tweak Jones

(Unfortunately I am putting the blog “The Elites cult of Death” on hold.Theres just so much data to go through.Anyway enjoy this article from:



What is it to be human? With the advent of modern technology, humanity as we know it may be on the road to extinction. We ask, just how long do we have left?


There was a time when humanity was considered the pinnacle of creation. We were made in God’s image and the Earth was considered to be the centre of the universe. That all changed after the Enlightenment period. Humanity was no longer perceived to be apex of all creation, but rather, an unintentional glitch in the vastness of the universe.
 The Enlightenment ideal that humanity could build a better future for itself through the use of scientific endeavour and discovery has now led to the rise of the transhumanism philosophical framework.

What is Transhumanism?

Julian Huxley first coined the term, “transhumanism”, in the 1950’s. Huxley was the first director of UNESCO and brother of author Aldous, who wrote the science fiction novel, “A Brave New World”

Julian Huxley was also a keen proponent of eugenics and it is fitting that that he was the first to use the term “transhumanism” as it is merely a variant of eugenics doctrine that he so heavily endorsed.

But what exactly is transhumanism? Transhumanism can loosely be described as physical and mental enhancement of humanity through technology. Transhumanist thinkers want to eradicate what they consider to be undesirable aspects of human nature, such as, aging, suffering, disease and even death. From the website:

“The enhancement options being discussed include radical extension of human health-span, eradication of disease, elimination of unnecessary suffering, and augmentation of human intellectual, physical, and emotional capacities.”

{mosregread}Transhumanism and the link to eugenics

While on the surface, transhumanism appears to have noble motives, on closer inspection, one begins to understand just how closely aligned it is to eugenics. A simple definition of eugenics is “selective breeding”. Instead of using technology, proponents of eugenics want to eradicate what they consider to be the undesirable aspects of humanity through selective breeding. From the Eugenics Archive site:

“Eugenics was, quite literally, an effort to breed better human beings – by encouraging the reproduction of people with “good” genes and discouraging those with “bad” genes. Eugenicists effectively lobbied for social legislation to keep racial and ethnic groups separate, to restrict immigration from southern and eastern Europe, and to sterilize people considered “genetically unfit.”

Now consider the similarities between the passage above and the Transhumanist values written by Nick Bostrom:

“Transhumanists view human nature as a work-in-progress, a half-baked beginning that we can learn to remold in desirable ways. Current humanity need not be the endpoint of evolution. Transhumanists hope that by responsible use of science, technology, and other rational means we shall eventually manage to become posthuman, beings with vastly greater capacities than present human beings have.”

Both the transhumanist and eugenics movements see humanity as imperfect and as a work-in-progress. The Enlightenment notion of perfecting humanity through science is prevalent in both movements. While humanity has certainly benefited from technological and scientific advancements since the Enlightenment, the most worrying aspect of transhumanism, like eugenics before it, is that “undesirable” traits of humanity must be exterminated before humanity can be considered as perfect. Who decides what are undesirable traits? Well, like eugenics, a scientific “elite” will be the ones to decide what is “undesirable”. From the FAQ:

“Initially, however, the greatest advantages will go to those who have the resources, the skills, and the willingness to learn to use new tools. One can speculate that some technologies may cause social inequalities to widen. For example, if some form of intelligence amplification becomes available, it may at first be so expensive that only the wealthiest can afford it. The same could happen when we learn how to genetically enhance our children. Those who are already well off would become smarter and make even more money. This phenomenon is not new. Rich parents send their kids to better schools and provide them with resources such as personal connections and information technology that may not be available to the less privileged. Such advantages lead to greater earnings later in life and serve to increase social inequalities.”

So here the transhumanists readily admit that their movement will exacerbate social inequalities and, once again, the fate of humanity will be left in the hands of a small elite. And yes, while the new technology that is invented will see the price of older technology eventually fall, who can say for certain that the once the elite have access to the technology they will even allow this technology to be used by anybody else? From the website:

“What about the hypothetical case in which someone intends to create, or turn themselves into, a being of so radically enhanced capacities that a single one or a small group of such individuals would be capable of taking over the planet? This is clearly not a situation that is likely to arise in the imminent future, but one can imagine that, perhaps in a few decades, the prospective creation of superintelligent machines could raise this kind of concern. The would-be creator of a new life form with such surpassing capabilities would have an obligation to ensure that the proposed being is free from psychopathic tendencies and, more generally, that it has humane inclinations. For example, a superintelligence should be built with a clear goal structure that has friendliness to humans as its top goal. Before running such a program, the builders of a superintelligence should be required to make a strong case that launching it would be safer than alternative courses of action.”

So according to the transhumanists, we should trust them, as they have an “obligation to ensure that the proposed being is free from psychopathic tendencies”. But who has the access to this technology? The future of humanity could be left to the whim of a scientific and rich elite. Maybe scientists like, Dr Pianka, who according to reports, advocated the killing of 90% of world’s populationthrough the ebola virus would be left to decide the fate of humanity. 

Transhumanists disguise the fact that their philosophy is based on eugenics by using terms such as “liberal eugenics” and “Reprogenetics”. These are both types of voluntary eugenics with the individual choosing whether to use the techniques and technology. In the transhumanist’s claim that their “liberal eugenics” will lead to a better society, one can clearly see the collectivist core at the heart of their movement.

“Some disability activists would call these policies eugenic, but society may have a legitimate interest in whether children are born healthy or disabled, leading it to subsidize the birth of healthy children, without actually outlawing or imposing particular genetic modifications.”

Now according to transhumanists, “society” has an interest in whether children are born healthy. The feelings of a mother who still loves her child despite him/her being disabled or unhealthy doesn’t matter as “society has a legitimate interest” in her child.

Transhumanists are prepared to disregard the individual’s thoughts and wishes for the “greater good” of society. While their “liberal eugenics” might not force people to become transhumanists, the fact is that any non-transhumanist will be so disadvantaged in this “technotopia” that they will either have to join them to exist in any meaningful way in society or they will simply become prey to a predatory technology elite.Malthusian Ideology

If the parallels with eugenics wasn’t bad enough, Transhumanist ideals also have parallels with Malthusian ideology. Transhumanist websites advocate the notion Malthusian notion of population control. From

“Choosing to remain childfree is both a rational, pragmatic decision and a powerful moral statement. This is especially true for women, whom evolution has disproportionately burdened with pregnancy, childbirth, and the bulk of the childrearing process. By saying ‘no’ to procreation, one rejects being just another link in life’s endless chain of births and deaths, just another runner in a mindless relay race. It is, in effect, a personal declaration of independence; a confirmation that one isn’t a means to an end, but an end in itself.”


“The only long-term method of assuring continued growth of average income is some form of population control, whether spontaneous or imposed, limiting the number of new persons created per year.”

Yes, just say, “no” to procreation, then perhaps elitists like Henry Kissinger will deem the population control in your country of a high enough standard to not use food as a weapon against you. Maybe the transhumanists will find their own Margaret Sanger and introduce birth control centres for the “genetically inferior”. From an article on eugenics:

“ Sanger is known as a crusader for contraceptive rights; but few know that her concern for contraception was based firmly on concern for racial control. Her early work in impoverished environments led her to the belief that ‘genetically inferior’ persons should have less children, and that centers for birth control should be ‘wisely’ placed in neighborhoods which were impoverished, which also frequently happened to be in minority settings.”


The final realisation of transhumanism is “post-humanism”. Post humanism, according to the World Transhumanist Association is defined as, “possible future beings whose basic capacities so radically exceed those of present humans as to be no longer unambiguously human by our current standards.”

Ray Kurzweil, a leading figure in the transhumanist movement believes that the technology to produce everlasting life isn’t far off.  Kurzweil claims that a technology singularityin the near future will mean that AI or computer intelligence will vastly exceed the capabilities of human beings and that these technological advancements will see the beginning of everlasting life and the end of suffering for transhumanists.
Transhumanists believe that once post-humanism is reached they will become gods, impervious to disease and with the ability to live eternally. They are under the deluded assumption that once they become “post-human” they will achieve godhood.

“We are very fortunate to live in these technologically advanced times, for science may soon give us the means to actually fulfill this imperative; to take hedonism to its logical conclusion and create what so far has only been a desperate fantasy — heaven. A mechanized heaven where we ourselves will be the gods, masters of our own minds, bodies, and environment. Pain will be optional, and pleasure guaranteed.”

The scientific arrogance of transhumanist thought is compounded by sentences such as, “The flesh, like man, is something to be overcome.” Ironically, despite lambasting religion, they essentially use the same ideas as traditional religion to appeal to “new followers”. The idea of eternal life has been the cornerstone of Christianity and Islam since their inception. Also, it seems that if you want to everlasting life then the best way to do so is donate cash. “There are myriad ways to contribute-…making a financial contribution”. Sounds like they have even taken their ideas from corrupt televangelists.

It cannot be argued that Enlightenment ideals have helped to prolong life expectancy and that many of the scientific endeavours undertaken since the Enlightenment have been of great value to humanity, however, one must question where technology and technology thinking is heading if human beings are to be considered obsolete in future. Even Bill Joy of SunMicrosystems has questioned if future technological advancements will signal the end of humanity

While undoubtedly, many of us enjoy aspects of scientific and technological advancement in our everyday lives, we must question a philosophical movement that has its roots so firmly entrenched in eugenics and population control. Although transhumanists may be operating under the delusion that advanced technology will make them gods, if a small scientific or wealthy elite who are proponents for population control get their hands on such technology, the rest of us will become all too aware of just how mortal we are.

What do you think of this article? Leave your opinions in the comment box below.



Posted in Great Films with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 2, 2008 by Tweak Jones

The Magic Bullet

Posted in JFK with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 30, 2008 by Tweak Jones

Magic Bullet

 The following is an excerpt from a book I highly recommend called “The JFK Assassination Debate:Lone Gunman versus Conspiracy.”by Prof.Michael L. Kurtz,published in 2006 by University Press of Kansas along with my own commentary.If this topic interests you but you don’t wont a long winded book and you wont the anylasis to be fare then please pick this up.

“One of the most critical pieces of evidence in the entire Kennedy assassination case,the bullet the warren commission called bullet 399,also found its evidentiary value destroyed by haphazard,careless,and neglectful handling. This was the bullet (supposedly) fired from Oswalds rifle that the commission claimed entred the back of JFKs neck,exited from the front of his throat,then entered Goevernor Conallys(The man directly in front of the president in the motorcade.)back,passed through his chest,exiting just below his right nipple,then entered the underside of his right wrist and exited from the top of it,and finally lodged in his left thigh…”

The strange discovery of Bullet 399 however made it unlikely that is had anything to do with the actual assassination  though the warren commission choose to believe it was the bullet that killed Kennedy.

(At the Hospital) “Darrell Tomlinson,a senior hospital engineer,got on the elevator and wheeled the now empty gurney Gov.Conally had been lay on into a corridor on the ground floor and placed it next to another gurney that had nothing to do with the assassination.The first gurney blocked the mens restroom.About 45 minutes later,Tomlinson, accompanied by his friend ,Nathan Pool, returned to the ground-floor corridor and noticed that the original gurney,not Conallys,was blocking the corridor because someone had used the mens room and had failed to return the gurney to its original position. When Tomlinson pushed that gurney back against the wall ,he and Pool noticed that a bullet,which had apparently been lodged under the mat,rolled out.”

That is literally how the bullet was found.And immediately after he informed the Secret Service Agent guarding JFKs body he was told to pick it up. He got O.P. Wright,the hospital security director to do it and that man took it to Agent Richard Johnsen who mearly put it in his pocket. No photograph of the exact spot it was found was taken,No one signed there initials on it,no one even though to pick it up with a handkerchief all standard practises in murder investigations of the time.

After several layers of people handling and miss-handling the missile it was used in the warren commission as evidence.That is if bullet 399 was even the original bullet found by Tomlinson.Agent Richard Johnsen and Secret service Director James Rowley,both of whom handled and observed the stretcher bullet,refused to identify bullet 399 as the one they turned over to the FBI.Even if they had it wouldint have mattered though since Tomlinson believed he had found the bullet on the other gurney not Conallys.

“Nevertheless, Warren Commission junior counsel Arlen Spector concluded that the bullet came from Governor Conallys stretcher. In his questioning of Darell Tomlinson ,Spector convinced the hospital engineer to admit the possibility that he found the bullet on Conallys strecher,even though Tomlinson originally believed that he had discovered it on the other gurney, one that had no connection to the assassination. In sharp prosecutorial tones, Specter interrogated Tomlinson almost as if he were a hostile witness,because Tomlinson’s original scenario had the bullet discovered on a gurney that had nothing to do with either President Kennedy or Governor Conally.This,of course, would have inevitably raised the possibility of the bullets having been planted,thereby demonstrating the existence of a conspiracy.”

After that Tomlinson spoke publicly about bullet 399 twice more and both times said he found it on the Gurney that had nothing to do with the assassination.

Now there is loads of things I could add for example how did bullet 399 change direction in mid-air and hit Governor Conally but I think the strange discovery and mishandling of the bullet alone is enough to convince most that there was indeed a Conspiracy.  Id like to add that Arlan Specter ,who is now a senator, almost single hadedly created the Magic bullet theory and had a great deal to do with the cover up.If you would like to “thank” him feel free to contact him using the information below:



Washington, D.C. Office:

711 Hart Senate Office Building SH-711
Washington, D.C., District of Columbia 20510-3802
Phone: (202) 224-4254
Fax: (202) 228-1229


Philadelphia Office: (more district offices

600 Arch St., #9400
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
Phone: (215) 597-7200
Fax: (215) 597-0406

WeAreChange confronts Arlen Specter and asks about the Kennedy Assassination and the Magic Bullet among other things:


Posted in Great Films with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 28, 2008 by Tweak Jones


Posted in Idiots with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 26, 2008 by Tweak Jones

This is a blog I originally posted on my infowars profile about a David Icke crazed idiot named illuminazi:


Illuminazi always says he has sources and evidence for his claims but has anyone really pressed him to prove it?

Well I just did. Illuminazi claimed he had sources for his belief but in spite of my asking him to reveal these sources for nearly 3 hours he refused to.He also tryed to use several tricks to discredit me such as acusing me of playing a game and noning his sources all along among other things.These tricks no doubt are taught to government paid disinformation agents,I dont have sources for that that we call an assumption illuminazi.

Heres the thing I was calling into question his credibility.Logicly he would have posted his “sources” realatively soon to prove me wrong and to thus keep what little credibility he already had but he did not.This can lead to only two conclusions,he is a Disinfo agent or he is a fucking liar who need to learn to shut up when he doesint have a clue.You deside.

Below is the complete conversation which you can also read on the group “Free Tibet down with the red commie scum”,Please note  that this conversation was on and off for three hours and in that time  he did not once give any sources.



illuminazi:tweak, you obviously have mental issues. go take it up with someone else, I’m bored.

Tweak:So rather then prove me wrong and vindicate yourself you would rather give a half answer and leave it at that? Wow thats weak,so sad you cant admit you dont have anything.

illuminazi:you can figure it out.

illuminazi:I believe I told you where to get my sources long ago…my blogs and groups.

Tweak:Hilarious you continue not to reveal your “source”.

illuminazi:are you still mad about the Staged Crucifixion group?

Tweak:But hey no matter what you do you have given me quite a nice body of post to use in a blog about your constant assertion that you have evidence for your beliefs.Thanks!!!

Tweak:I have asked you several times politely. Frankly there is no logical reason for you not to reveal your sources considering I am calling into question your whole notion of “having evidence” for all the shit you pull out of your ass and post on this site. Every minute you do not post your “sources” My argument that you are a liar and a disinfo agent becomes stronger and it been well over 100 minutes.
Again anyone can go through all these posts and know I speak the truth here.

illuminazi:say please.

Tweak:Must we continue this dance? Why not admit you have no sourses and end it?Or you could just shut you fucking lieing mouth,either ways fine! But again post the sources you have for the belief that the Dalai Lama is NWO as you aserted earlier.
Again I ask anyone reading this to go back and note how longI have been asking and not recieving these sources illuminazi clams to have.

illuminazi:what would you like to know exactly tweak?

Tweak:You have not mentioned one source and anyone can look through the posts. It is rather sad that to cover your own ass you would accuse me of playing a game. The only game being played here is called “Tell everyone you have sources and then hope no one notices that you lied”.Its loads of fun.

Illuminazi:you know my sources, boy. quit playing games.


ENDisNIGH:This is also one of the few things I must say that I agree with Illuminazi on. The Dali Lama is diabolical.

Tweak:This is the first Ive heard of that and after pressing you for over 30 minutes I some how doubt it to be true.Why not present them here and prove me wrong?

illuminazi:whats funny is that I am typing to you after your behavior the past 2 days and talkin shit for over a month. my sources are within the information in my blogs and groups.

tweak:Its funny that you are critizing my posts tone while Im mearly asking you to present your sources. Quit staling,either present your sources or admit you dont have any.

illuminazi:don’t like that one either I’m afraid…too much arrogance. try again.

Tweak:I am asking you for these mythical “sources” you claim to have. Present them.

illuminazi:I just don’t like how you asked me, period.

tweak:Notice how when you press an agent of disinfo for evidence they can not but instead turn to character assasination.

illuminazi:I have EVIDENCE that tweak is a hermaphrodite. Please look in my blogs and groups.

tweak:Who are these credible sources? That would be a second hand kind of evidence which is not exactly trust worthy but its better then the nothing you have presented here.

illuminazi:never said I had “evidence” that the Dali Lama was NWO, I said I learned it from credible people/sources…. the sources that you call hoaxes and liars without researching. so quit talkin already ya pimply ass punk. lol. you are such an annoying little nerd.

Tweak:Show us your evidence please,or you should shut the fuck up.

Tweak:Interesting but I wouldint call that evidence. If you actually have any evidence Im sure others,not me according to you,would fined it useful.

illuminazi:why so you can disagree with it and call it a hoax like an annoying jackass… you’re an idiot! yesterday you told everyone to eat as many soy products as possible, trying to poison your fellow humans because you hate yourself? You remind me of Adolf Hitler you little crybaby.

Tweak:So why have you not posted your “evidence”? Is it because you dont have any?

Illuminazi:____, ___.

Tweak:Either Post your evidence or shut the fuck up.Thanks.

Illuminazi:for you personally, yes. for anyone else that would like to know, no.

tweak:Would that be your evidence then?

Illuminazi:eat a bowl of dick.

Tweak:Show use your evidence then instead of endlessly post “seemingly” crazy BS all the time.

Illuminazi: it is not my opinion that he(The Dalai Lama) is NWO, it is what I learned from research and credible sources that don’t mess around. people tend to think I am going around spreading information that I conjured up in my head or something. if I didn’t know this information my opinion would be that he is a nice guy, from the looks of him… and my opinion would be incorrect.


Posted in Great Films with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 24, 2008 by Tweak Jones


Posted in Great Films with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 24, 2008 by Tweak Jones